Skip to main content

But how did protolanguage actually start?

Buy Article:

$36.18 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

In dealing with the nature of protolanguage, an important formative factor in its development, and one that would surely have influenced that nature, has too often been neglected: the precise circumstances under which protolanguage arose. Three factors are involved in this neglect: a failure to appreciate radical differences between the functions of language and animal communication, a failure to relate developments to the overall course of human evolution, and the supposition that protolanguage represents a package, rather than a series of separate developments that sequentially impacted the communication of pre-humans. An approach that takes these factors into account is very briefly suggested.

Keywords: ANIMAL COMMUNICATION; COMPOSITIONALITY; FUNCTIONAL REFERENCE; HOLOPHRASIS; HUMAN EVOLUTION; LANGUAGE; PALEOANTHROPOLOGY; PROTOLANGUAGE

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/is.9.1.12bic

Publication date: 2008-04-01

More about this publication?
  • Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems
  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more