Skip to main content

Grammation, regrammation, and degrammation: Tense loss in Russian

Buy Article:

$36.18 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Taking Heine’s (2003) characterization of Grammaticalization as its point of departure, this paper proposes an elementary framework, and corresponding terminology, for the description of the most common types of historical change in grammar (changes in content, content syntax, expression, and morphosyntax) and the types of innovation that give rise to them (neologism, extension, adoption, reanalysis, monolingual and bilingual). These basic conceptual tools of the historical linguist are illustrated with an analytic account of the development of the Russian tense–aspect system, from prehistory through the attested period. The account includes a plausible explication of the remarkable historical reduction in tense–aspect paradigms, from eight in Old Russian through five in Middle Russian to three in the modern language.

Keywords: aspect; extension; grammaticalization; innovation; markedness; reanalysis; renewal; tense

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dia.23.2.02and

Affiliations: UCLA

Publication date: January 1, 2006

More about this publication?
  • International Journal for Historical Linguistics
jbp/dia/2006/00000023/00000002/art00001
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more