Basic emotions and their biological substrates: A nominalistic interpretation

Authors: Zachar P.¹; Bartlett S.²

Source: Consciousness & Emotion, Volume 2, Number 2, 2002 , pp. 189-221(33)

Publisher: John Benjamins Publishing Company

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

The thesis of this article is that an attitude akin to pragmatism is internal to the scientific enterprise itself, and as a result many scientists will make the same types of non-essentialistic interpretations of their subject matter that are made by pragmatists. This is demonstrably true with respect to those scientists who study the biological basis of emotion such as Panksepp, LeDoux, and Damasio. Even though these scientists are also influenced by what cognitive psychologists call the essentialist bias, their research programs are coherent with Peter Zachar’s rejection of natural kinds in favor of practical kinds. When the confrontation with complexity leads a scientist to offer non-essentialist interpretations, two popular options are to go eliminativist or go nominalist. Pragmatists prefer the nominalistic option, and we provide reasons for suggesting that scientists should as well.

Keywords: emotion; nominalism; essentialism; natural kind; eliminativism; pragmatism; consciousness

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1075/ce.2.2.02zac

Affiliations: 1: Auburn University Montgomery 2: Southern Methodist University

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$38.49 plus tax Refund Policy