Image Quality Comparison Between JPEG and JPEG2000. I. Psychophysical Investigation
Abstract:The original JPEG compression standard is efficient at low to medium levels of compression with relatively low levels of loss in visual image quality and has found widespread use in the imaging industry. Excessive compression using JPEG however, results in well-known artifacts such as "blocking" and "ringing," and the variation in image quality as a result of differing scene content is well documented. JPEG 2000 has been developed to improve on JPEG in terms of functionality and image quality at lower bit rates. One of the more fundamental changes is the use of a discrete wavelet transform instead of a discrete cosine transform, which provides several advantages both in terms of the way in which the image is encoded and overall image quality. This study involves a comparison of subjective image quality between JPEG and JPEG 2000 to establish whether JPEG 2000 does indeed demonstrate significant improvements in visual quality. A particular focus of this work is the inherent scene dependency of the two algorithms and their influence on subjective image quality results. Further work on the characterization of scene content is carried out in a connected study [S. Triantaphillidou, E. Allen, and R. E. Jacobson, “Image quality comparison between JPEG and JPEG2000. II. Scene dependency, scene analysis, and classification”, J. Imaging Sci. Technol. 51, 259 (2007)]. © 2007 Society for Imaging Science and Technology.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: Imaging Technology Research Group, University of Westminster, School of Media, Arts and Design, Harrow Campus, Watford Road, Northwick Park, Harrow HA1 3TP, United Kingdom
Publication date: 2007-05-01
The Journal of Imaging Science and Technology (JIST) is dedicated to the advancement of imaging science knowledge, the practical applications of such knowledge, and how imaging science relates to other fields of study. The pages of this journal are open to reports of new theoretical or experimental results, and to comprehensive reviews. Only original manuscripts that have not been previously published, nor currently submitted for publication elsewhere, should be submitted.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- Terms & Conditions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites