Skip to main content

Comparing automated and human ratings of photographic aesthetics

Buy Article:

$20.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

ACQUINE has made automated rating of photographic aesthetics available on the web. We compare the influence of various factors, such as color, sharpness, and contrast, on the ratings that it gives. We also compare results with those given by human judges.

Document Type: Research Article

Publication date: January 1, 2011

More about this publication?
  • CIC is the premier annual technical gathering for scientists, technologists, and engineers working in the areas of color science and systems, and their application to color imaging. Participants represent disciplines ranging from psychophysics, optical physics, image processing, color science to graphic arts, systems engineering, and hardware and software development. While a broad mix of professional interests is the hallmark of these conferences, the focus is color. CICs traditionally offer two days of short courses followed by three days of technical sessions that include three keynotes, an evening lecture, and a vibrant interactive papers session. An endearing symbol of the meeting is the Cactus Award, given each year to the author(s) of the best interactive paper presentation.

  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • Terms & Conditions
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
ist/cic/2011/00002011/00000001/art00044
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more