The Bare Metaphysical Possibility of Bare Dispositions
Author: McKitrick J.
Source: Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Volume 66, Number 2, 1 March 2003 , pp. 349-369(21)
Publisher: International Phenomenological Society
Abstract:
Many philosophers hold that all dispositions must have independent causal bases. I challenge this view, hence defending the possibility of bare dispositions. In part 1, I explain more fully what I mean by "disposition," "causal basis," and "bare disposition." In part 2, I consider the claim that the concept of a disposition entails that dispositions are not bare. In part 3, I consider arguments, due to Prior, Pargetter, and Jackson, that dispositions necessarily have distinct causal bases. In part 4, I consider arguments by Smith and Stoljar that there can't be bare dispositions because they would make for unwelcome "barely true" counterfactuals. In the end, I find no reason to deny the possibility of bare dispositions.Document Type: Research article
Publication date: 2003-03-01
- This journal is now published by Blackwell Publishing. Current issues of this journal are available from here . Backfile content is in the process of being reloaded by Blackwell, and will shortly be removed from this page and available only from the Blackwell link above. If you have any queries about continued access to this journal please contact mailto:onlinehelp@oxon.blackwellpublishing.com.
- Information for Authors
- Subscribe to this Title
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
- In this: publication
- By this: publisher
- In this Subject: Philosophy
- By this author: McKitrick J.

Shopping cart
Receive new issue alert
Get Permissions