Quantitative comparison of three different types of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction methods: Laxity and 3-D kinematic measurements
Authors: Hagemeister N.1; Long R.2; Yahia L.1; Duval N.1; Krudwig W.3; Witzel U.4; de Guise J.A.5
Source: Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering, Volume 12, Number 1, 2002 , pp. 47-57(11)
Publisher: IOS Press
Abstract:
In this project, we compared knee laxity and 3-D knee kinematics after ACL reconstruction on cadaver knees using (1) bonepatellar tendonbone two-tunnel; (2) synthetic ligament two-tunnel; and (3) synthetic ligament over-the-top technique. We used a computer assisted system, based on the acquisition of the knee's movement with magnetic sensors (Polhemus, Vermont, USA). The use of personalised three-dimensional (3D) models of the bones enabled us to ensure a reproducible measurement of three-dimensional kinematic and laxity parameters. Our results showed that even when knee laxity was restored to normal, 3D kinematic measurements revealed that the reconstructions tended to under or over-constrain the knee's movement. This study shows that 3D kinematics is a complementary measurement that can be useful to get a better comprehension of the knee's function after ligament reconstruction.
Keywords: Ligament; reconstruction; 3D kinematics; in vitro; evaluation
Document Type: Research article
Affiliations: 1: Groupe de recherche en Biomécanique/Biomatériaux, (GRBB) École Polytechnique, Montreal, Canada 2: Laboratoire de recherche en Imagerie et Orthopédie (LIO), Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Quebec H2L 4M1, Canada 3: Marienhospital, Erwitte, Germany 4: Forschungsgruppe Biomechanik, Bochum University, Germany 5: Laboratoire d'imagerie, de vision et d'intelligence artificielle (LIVIA), École de technologie supérieure, Montreal, Canada

Click here for Page Help