If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email help@ingentaconnect.com

The CKM suppressed &B(B_s) \rightarrow \bar{D}_{(s)}P\hbox{,}\, \bar{D}_{(s)}V\hbox{,} \bar{D}_{(s)}^*P\hbox{,}\, \bar{D}_{(s)}^*V ; decays in the perturbative QCD approach

$47.81 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Buy Article:

Abstract:

Although the two-body charmed decays &B_{(s)} \rightarrow \bar{D}_{(s)}^{(*)}P ; and &\bar{D}_{(s)}^{(*)}V ;, where P (V) denotes a light pseudoscalar (vector) meson, are Cabbibo–Kobayashi–Maskawa (CKM) suppressed compared with the B(s)D(*)(s)P and D(*)(s)V decays, they are important in the CKM angle  = 3 extraction method. We investigated these decays in the perturbative QCD approach to the leading order of mD/mB and ΛQCD/mD expansion. We find that the nonfactorizable emission diagrams and the annihilation diagrams are not negligible in many of these channels. The numerical results show that most channels have branching ratios with an order of 10−6 or 10−7. The ratio needed for the CKM angle  extraction is estimated as &r = \frac{|A(B^- \rightarrow \bar{D}^0 K^-)|}{|A(B^- \rightarrow D^0 K^-)|} = 0.092_{-0.003-0.003}^{+0.012+0.003}, ; which is too small for the experiments. Some of the &B_{(s)}\rightarrow \bar{D}_{(s)}^*V ; decays have a very large transversely polarized contribution that can reach 80%.

Document Type: Research Article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/37/1/015002

Publication date: January 1, 2010

Related content

Tools

Favourites

Share Content

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more