Author: Cazeaux, Clive

Source: Journal of Visual Art Practice, Volume 7, Number 2, 1 November 2008 , pp. 107-132(26)

Publisher: Intellect

Abstract:

I review four book-length studies of practice-based research: Carter (2004); Gray and Malins (2004); Hannula, Suoranta and Vadn (2005); and Sullivan (2005). I outline the positions adopted by each of the books on the nature and scope of practice-based research and assess the extent to which they present clear, coherent and applicable accounts. A thesis present in all four books, I argue, is that art is uniquely placed to generate research on account of its being inherently interdisciplinary, that is to say, art in and of itself involves combining different subjects and methods. However, while all four books set out perspectives and methods relevant to this view, none provides a fully worked-out theory. Carter (2004) and Sullivan (2005) offer the most explicit and sustained studies of interdisciplinarity, but omit to say precisely how it generates knowledge. Interdisciplinarity is hinted at by Hannula, Suoranta and Vadn (2005) and by Gray and Malins (2004) as being crucial to artistic research, but the idea is not pursued. I demonstrate briefly how Kant's theory of knowledge can go some way towards filling the gap left by the four books in the interdisciplinary debate. On his view, concepts determine the content of experience, and the interdisciplinary tension between concepts creates occasions for reality to surprise us and new observations to be made.

Keywords: interdisciplinarity; knowledge; practice; research; transcognition; verbalization

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/jvap.7.2.107_1

Affiliations: 1: University of Wales Institute, Cardiff.

Publication date: 2008-11-01

More about this publication?

• The domain of visual art hosts a multitude of artistic forms and practices. The Journal of Visual Art Practice supports research across the entire range of this varied field. The journal engages with the progressive nature of the subject, reflecting upon the changing terrain of art in recent years.
• Editorial Board
• Information for Authors
• Subscribe to this Title
• ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Related content

• In this: publication
• By this: publisher
• In this Subject: Arts and Humanities ,  Arts (General)
• By this author: Cazeaux, Clive

Website © Publishing Technology. Article copyright remains with the publisher, society or author(s) as specified within the article.

• Terms and conditions
• Privacy policy
• Information for advertisers