Skip to main content

Scientific Methods Must Be Public, and Descriptive Experience Sampling Qualifies

Buy Article:

$27.68 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

I defend three main conclusions. First, whether a method is public is important, because non-public methods are scientifically illegitimate. Second, there are substantive prescriptive differences between the view that private methods are legitimate and the view that private methods are illegitimate. Third, Descriptive Experience Sam-pling is a public (and hence legitimate) method.

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Email: piccininig@umsl.edu

Publication date: January 1, 2011

imp/jcs/2011/00000018/00000001/art00006
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more