Attribution of Mind: A psychologist's contribution to the consciousness debate

Author: Kaernbach, Christian

Source: Journal of Consciousness Studies, Volume 15, Number 4, 2008 , pp. 66-82(17)

Publisher: Imprint Academic

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $28.46 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Could computers ever be conscious? Will they ever have ideas that one could attribute to them and not to the programmer? Will robots be able to 'feel pain', instead of processing bits from sensors informing about danger? Will they have true emotions? These questions may never be answered, but it makes sense to ask whether humans will ever attribute mind to artifacts. This paper suggests introducing a third level of claims regarding artificial intelligence (AI), which is in between 'weak AI' and 'strong AI', the so-called 'attributed AI'. This level requires more than weak AI ('behave as if', which could be said of any desktop calculator), but is less presumptuous than strong AI ('computers that think', a claim that is hard to prove). Attributed AI can be measured. This paper discusses behavioral paradigms for measurements of attributed AI and presents first experimental data.

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Institut fur Psychologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Olshausenstr. 62, 24098 Kiel, Germany.

Publication date: 2008-01-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page