Higher-order thought and naturalist accounts of consciousness

Author: Schroder J.

Source: Journal of Consciousness Studies, Volume 8, Number 11, 2001 , pp. 27-46(20)

Publisher: Imprint Academic

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $28.46 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This paper makes a comparison between naturalist and non-naturalist theories of consciousness with respect to their explanatory merits. It focuses on David Rosenthal's higher-order thought (HOT) theory, arguing that the motives for higher-order theories are based on a confusion of three distinct meanings of the term 'intrinsic'. The explanatory power of HOT theories is compared with that of an alternative nonrepresentational theory, offered as an example of a naturalistic account. The latter is found overall to have more virtues and less shortcomings that the higher-order theory.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Grunewaldstr. 12, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.

Publication date: 2001-01-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page