Conceiving what is not there

Author: Botterell A.¹

Source: Journal of Consciousness Studies, Volume 8, Number 8, 2001 , pp. 21-42(22)

Publisher: Imprint Academic

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

In this paper I argue that certain so-called conceivability arguments fail to show that a currently popular version of physicalism in the philosophy of mind is false. Concentrating on an argument due to David Chalmers, I first argue that Chalmers misrepresents the relation between conceivability and possibility. I then argue that the intuition behind the conceivability of so-called zombie worlds can be accounted for without having to suppose that such worlds are genuinely conceivable. I conclude with some general remarks about the nature of conceivability.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Philosophy, Sonoma State University, Rohnert Park, CA 94928, USA. Email:andrew.botterell@sonoma.edu

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$29.05 plus tax