Skip to main content

It's been a pleasure, but that's not why I did it. Are Sober and Wilson too generous toward their selfish brethren?

Buy Article:

$27.68 plus tax (Refund Policy)


Sober and Wilson demonstrate convincingly the fallacies of arguments for fundamental biological and psychological selfishness and establish the plausibility of both biological and psychological altruism. However, I suggest that they are more generous to proponents of fundamental selfishness than they need be and that morality is closer to our evolved and learned capacities than they suggest. I am less generous toward advocates of fundamental selfishness than are our altruistic authors.

Document Type: Review Article

Affiliations: Dept. of Philosophy at Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR 97219.

Publication date: January 1, 2000

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Partial Open Access Content
Partial Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more