Skip to main content

It's been a pleasure, but that's not why I did it. Are Sober and Wilson too generous toward their selfish brethren?

Buy Article:

$18.02 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Sober and Wilson demonstrate convincingly the fallacies of arguments for fundamental biological and psychological selfishness and establish the plausibility of both biological and psychological altruism. However, I suggest that they are more generous to proponents of fundamental selfishness than they need be and that morality is closer to our evolved and learned capacities than they suggest. I am less generous toward advocates of fundamental selfishness than are our altruistic authors.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Document Type: Review Article

Affiliations: Dept. of Philosophy at Lewis and Clark College, Portland, OR 97219.

Publication date: 2000-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more