Skip to main content

And the meme raths outgrabe

Buy Article:

$25.62 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This is a commentary on ‘Archetypes and memes: Their structure, relationships and behaviours’, by C.M.H. Nunn (1998) and (more briefly) on the commentary upon it by Harald Atmanspacher (1998). Page numbers in this article refer to these two papers. Let us start with faint praise. Nunn writes well and engages themes that are sure to interest many readers. He is well informed, shows sensitivity to the evolution and elusiveness of Jung’s thought, as well as to the history of medicine, and he (almost) has one good idea. Atmanspacher plays upon the same themes, also seems well informed, and (also almost) has a good idea, though he writes more awkwardly. In brief, Nunn relates Jung's archetypes to (Dennett's version of) Dawkins’ memes and suggests an epidemiological angle, Atmanspacher suggests a hierarchical arrangement of memes, and I suggest they are talking dangerous jabberwocky.

Document Type: Review Article

Affiliations: Donnya Wheelwell is the pseudonym of a science professional.

Publication date: 1998-03-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more