Skip to main content

Commentary on Chris Nunn's ‘Archetypes and memes’

Buy Article:

$27.68 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The concept of archetypes has received a number of fundamentally different interpretations, and there are numerous additional philosophical concepts which can be characterized as modifications of those interpretations. Chris Nunn’s paper (Nunn, 1998) represents an approach to bringing a specific one among those concepts -- Richard Dawkins’ neo-Darwinistic conception of memes (Dawkins, 1976) -- into contact with the notion of archetypes as it has been mainly popularized by Carl Gustav Jung. Nunn states rightly that Jung’s own understanding of and emphasis on archetypes changed considerably during his lifetime. Therefore the difficulty is not only how to relate memes to archetypes, but also to distinguish that concept of archetypes to which memes relate from those to which they do not.

Document Type: Review Article

Affiliations: Max-Planck-Institut fur extraterrestriche Physik, D-85740 Garching, Germany.

Publication date: 1998-03-01

  • Access Key
  • Free ContentFree content
  • Partial Free ContentPartial Free content
  • New ContentNew content
  • Open Access ContentOpen access content
  • Partial Open Access ContentPartial Open access content
  • Subscribed ContentSubscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed ContentPartial Subscribed content
  • Free Trial ContentFree trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more