The Hornswoggle problem

Author: Churchland P.S.

Source: Journal of Consciousness Studies, Volume 3, Numbers 5-6, 1996 , pp. 402-408(7)

Publisher: Imprint Academic

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Beginning with Thomas Nagel, various philosophers have propsed setting conscious experience apart from all other problems of the mind as ‘the most difficult problem’. When critically examined, the basis for this proposal reveals itself to be unconvincing and counter-productive. Use of our current ignorance as a premise to determine what we can never discover is one common logical flaw. Use of ‘I-cannot-imagine’ arguments is a related flaw. When not much is known about a domain of phenomena, our inability to imagine a mechanism is a rather uninteresting psychological fact about us, not an interesting metaphysical fact about the world. Rather than worrying too much about the meta-problem of whether or not consciousness is uniquely hard, I propose we get on with the task of seeing how far we get when we address neurobiologically the problems of mental phenomena.

Language: English

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: Department of Philosophy, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.:

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$29.05 plus tax Refund Policy