IS BRADLEY A RETRIBUTIVIST?

Author: Brooks, Thom

Source: History of Political Thought, Volume 32, Number 1, 2011 , pp. 83-95(13)

Publisher: Imprint Academic

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $27.78 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Perhaps the least controversial area of F.H. Bradley's writings relates to his views on punishment. Commentators universally recognize Bradley's theory of punishment as a retributivist theory of punishment. This article challenges the received wisdom. I argue that Bradley does not endorse retributivism as commonly understood. Instead, he defends the view that punishment is non-retributivist and serves the end of societal maintenance. Moreover, Bradley defends this view consistently from Ethical Studies to later work on punishment. Instead of holding a theory of punishment largely unique amongst British Idealists of his time, Bradley's views on punishment are far more consistent than previously thought.

Keywords: Oakeshott; Hegel; der Staat; societas; God; Bosanquet; Bradley

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Politics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU.

Publication date: 2011-01-01

Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page