Skip to main content

THE DOUBLE BIND: THE AMBIVALENT TREATMENT OF TRAGIC PASSIONS IN HANNAH ARENDT’S THEORY OF REVOLUTION

Buy Article:

$18.02 plus tax (Refund Policy)

This article offers a close reading of Hannah Arendt’s book On Revolution. It exposes the ambivalence of Arendt with regard to tragedy and mimesis. This ambivalence is not just her own; it is inherent in the treatment of tragedy and mimesis throughout the history of political thought. In spite of Arendt’s argument that privileges the limited American Revolution against the boundless French one, in her rhetoric and in her storytelling Arendt presents a unitary but dialectical picture of revolution, where suffering and foundation are inseparably intertwined. The founding public action of revolutionaries implies a crisis of mimetic passions (of fear and pity) which threatens to undo, but also set the stage for, revolution. This negative, passionate and passive side of revolution helps us to come to terms with the non-productive but emancipatory revolutions in the Eastern Europe of 1989-91.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Arendt; Aristotle; Lacoue-Labarthe; Robert Pirro; Sophocles; double bind; fear; melancholia; mimesis; pity; revolution; tragedy

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Political Science and Sociology, The European University at SaintPetersburg, Gagarinskaya 3, 191187 Saint-Petersburg, Russia, Email: [email protected]

Publication date: 2007-01-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more