IDEAS AND ACTUALITY IN THE SOCIAL CONTRACT: KANT AND ROUSSEAU

Author: Williams, David1

Source: History of Political Thought, Volume 28, Number 3, 2007 , pp. 469-495(27)

Publisher: Imprint Academic

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Patrick Riley has argued that Immanuel Kant was the 'most adequate' of the social contractarians. This reputation was built on Kant's reliance on ideas rather than actual consent to give the contract its legitimacy. The greatest advantage in his so doing was to limit the potential of tyrannical or despotic regimes. A danger resides in this approach, however: by ignoring actual consent, one may not get the compliance required to achieve these standards. In this respect, by interpreting Rousseau as likewise committed to ideas, Kant may be bettered by his Genevan predecessor, since Rousseau incorporates both ideas and actual consent. This combination serves the dual function of promising compliance to high ideas -- and in this respect Rousseau might actually be the 'most adequate' of social contract theorists.

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Associate Professor of Political Science and Philosophy, University of Wisconsin --Stevens Point, Stevens Point, WI 54481, USA., Email: David.Williams@uwsp.edu

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$29.05 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A