NO RUBBER STAMP: HEGEL'S CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCH

Author: Brooks, Thom¹

Source: History of Political Thought, Volume 28, Number 1, 2007 , pp. 91-119(29)

Publisher: Imprint Academic

Key:

- Free Content

- New Content

- Subscribed Content

- Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Perhaps one of the most controversial aspects of Hegel's Philosophy of Right for contemporary interpreters is its discussion of the constitutional monarch. This is true despite the general agreement amongst virtually all interpreters that Hegel's monarch is no more powerful than modern constitutional monarchs and is an institution worthy of little attention or concern. In this article, I will examine whether or not it matters who is the monarch and what domestic and foreign powers he has. I argue against the virtual consensus of recent interpreters that Hegel's monarch is far more powerful than has been understood previously. In part, Hegel's monarch is perhaps even more powerful than Hegel himself may have realized and I will demonstrate certain inconsistencies with some of his claims. My reading represents a distinctive break from the virtual consensus, without endorsing the view that Hegel was a totalitarian.

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Politics, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, Email: t.brooks@newcastle.ac.uk

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$29.05 plus tax Refund Policy