Imperial Lessons from Athens and Sparta: Eighteenth-Century British Histories of Ancient Greece

In this: publication
By this: publisher
In this Subject: <a title="Political Science" href="/content/subcat;jsessionid=5lyftpa6th3b.alexandra?j_subject=242&j_availability=">Political Science
By this author: Atac

Author: Atac

Source: History of Political Thought, Volume 27, Number 4, 2006 , pp. 642-660(19)

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $27.78 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The only perspective through which eighteenth-century British histories of Ancient Greece have been studied is their attitude towards monarchy and democracy. Because these texts collectively depicted monarchy as the ideal type of government and democracy as the worst, scholars have labelled them simply as pro-Spartan and anti- Athenian. Nevertheless, ancient history-writing was then a practice aiming at providing insights into as many contemporary political topics as possible and Ancient Greek history-writing was no exception. The question of empire appears to be a problem that equally preoccupied the historians. In that sense, the eighteenth-century British histories of Ancient Greece serve as an alternative source for arriving at the contemporary understanding of empire in Britain. Furthermore, the tone of the historians' arguments, which was very much determined by the theme selected, was far from always pro-Spartan. Within the context of empire, Athens was presented as the model to be emulated.

Keywords: Eighteenth-Century British Empire; Commercial empire; Militaristic empire; Ancient-history writing in 18th-century Britain; Ancient Greek history-writing; neo-classicism; Athenian empire; Spartan empire; John Gast; John Gillies; Oliver Goldsmith; Thomas Hind; Thomas Leland; William Mitford; John Potter; Temple Stanyan