Skip to main content

Oriental despotism: Anquetil-Duperron's response to Montesquieu

Buy Article:

$17.65 plus tax (Refund Policy)

The leading arguments of Anquetil-Duperron's Legislation Orientale (1778) are analysed as a sustained attempt by this early Indologist to refute Montesquieu's influential theory of oriental despotism with respect to the Muslim regimes of Turkey, Persia and India (the Mogul empire). Anquetil adduces literary evidence and his own observations to refute the claim that Asian governments are invariably arbitrary, lawless and without property rights. Rather, similarities in these basic respects between European and Asian societies underline the common humanity of their inhabitants, in keeping with the convictions of Enlightenment humanism and contrary to some eighteenth-century justifications for European empires.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Anquetil-Duperron; Enlightenment; India; Islam; Mogul; Montesquieu; Orientalism; oriental despotism

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Political Science, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.. Email: [email protected]

Publication date: 2001-04-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more