Skip to main content

Overcoming false dichotomies: Mill, Marx and the welfare state

Buy Article:

$17.65 plus tax (Refund Policy)

There is a strong perception in the social sciences that the welfare state and socialism differ qualitatively rather than by degree. This perception holds that the welfare state is fundamentally incapable, in any incarnation, of realizing the social aspirations of socialism, and that socialism is likewise destructive of welfare state ideals. As a result of such thinking, the marginal, intersectional world that does exist between the welfare state and socialism becomes hidden from view. This consequence is of particular concern to theorists in search of a more egalitarian society than markets, on their own, can produce. This paper analyses the welfare state/socialism dichotomy in the works of Marx and J.S. Mill, looking to see whether it was plausible at its point of historical origin. The conclusion is that it was not; that the dichotomy only seemed to make sense because neither theorist employed a language capable of capturing the complexity of the social relations in question.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Data/Media
No Metrics

Keywords: Capital; Capitalism; Communism; Distribution; Grundrisse; Keynes; Markets; Marx; Mill; Ownership; Principles of Political Economy; Production; Property; Socialism; Weber; Welfare state

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303. Email:[email protected]

Publication date: 2000-04-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more