Skip to main content

‘Guards and fences’: property and obligation in Locke's political thought

Buy Article:

$18.39 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Property and political obligation are central issues of Locke's Two Treatises of Government. It is agreed that obligation is somehow contingent upon the government's protecting the property of its members. But ‘property’ in the Two Treatises had two meanings — in the state of nature usually referring to material possessions but in civil society meaning ‘life, liberty and estate’ — and its relationship to political obligation is complex. This complexity results from Locke's varying accounts of the movement from the state of nature to civil society: he combined a traditional natural law justification of ownership with a legalist and semi-Aristotelian conception of the ends of and limitations on the state; he failed to provide a full account of the obligation of landless residents; he left unsettled difficulties inherent in the concept ‘property’ itself. Locke's notions of ‘trust’ and the ‘public good’ pointed to solutions to be worked out by future generations.
No References
No Citations
No Supplementary Data
No Article Media
No Metrics

Keywords: "‘life; liberty; and estate’; Locke; John; Wood; Neal; consent; political obligation; property; state of nature

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Political Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. Email:[email protected]

Publication date: 01 March 2000

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more