Geodetic and direct mass-balance measurements: comparison and joint analysis

Author: Cogley, J. Graham

Source: Annals of Glaciology, Volume 50, Number 50, March 2009 , pp. 96-100(5)

Publisher: International Glaciological Society

Purchase options

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$30.93 plus tax Refund Policy

More about this publication?

The Annals of Glaciology is a peer-reviewed, thematic journal published 2 to 4 times a year by the International Glaciological Society (IGS). Publication frequency is determined and volume/issue numbers assigned by the IGS Council on a year-to-year basis and with a lead time of 3 to 4 years.
Themes can be on any aspect of the study of snow and ice. Individual members can make a suggestion for a theme for an Annals issue to the Secretary General, who will forward it to the IGS Publications Committee. The IGS Publication Committee will make a recommendation for an individual themed Annals issue, together with a potential Annals Chief Editor for that issue, to IGS Council. The IGS Council will make the decision whether to proceed, taking into account the spread of topics and the overall capacity for publication of pages in Annals.
Editorial Board
Information for Authors

More like this?

In this: publication
By this: publisher
In this Subject: Geology , Meteorology & Climatology
By this author: Cogley, J. Graham

Content Key:

- Free

- New

- Open Access

- Subscribed

- Free Trial

Abstract:

This paper describes a new compilation of both direct and geodetic mass-balance measurements, develops a procedure to reduce diverse balance measurements over different time-spans to common time-spans, and presents updated estimates of global average balance of small glaciers based on the enlarged compilation. Although geodetic measurements are fewer than direct measurements, they cover four times as many balance years. Direct and geodetic measurements are unbiased with respect to one another, but differences are often substantial. The statistical procedure can be understood by imagining that an n-year balance measurement is an average of a series of 1 year measurements. The series is hypothetical but we can calculate the uncertainty of each of its elements if, in addition to its measured average, we can also estimate its standard deviation. For this claim to be valid, the annual series must be stationary and normally distributed with independent (roughly, uncorrelated) elements, for which there is reasonable evidence. The need to know the standard deviation means that annual direct measurements from a nearby glacier, or equally reliable information about variability, are indispensable. Given this information, the new methodology results in moderately more negative balances. This is probably because tidewater glaciers are better represented in the geodetic data. In any case, the most recent published estimate of global average balance, 0.8-1.0 mm a⁻¹ of sea-level equivalent for 2001-04, is now increased substantially to 1.1-1.4 mm a⁻¹ for 2001-05.

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.3189/172756409787769744