Skip to main content

Monophyly and paraphyly: A discourse without end?

Buy Article:

$16.27 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The ongoing discourse on monophyly versus paraphyly shows apparent lack of mutual understanding among schools of biological taxonomy. The principal reason behind the frozen disagreement is that these terms were redefined repeatedly. Although terminological discrepancy has long been recognized, relatively few attempts have been made to clarify this. As a consequence, contemporary taxonomy still uses three different definitions of monophyly, and therefore paraphyly. Resolution is possible provided that the terms (a) monophyly and paraphyly are used for diachronous classifications and phylogenetic trees; (b) monoclady and paraclady for synchronous classifications and cladograms of contemporaneous organisms; and (c) monothety and non-monothety for groups in classifications derived by the pattern cladistic approach.

Keywords: CLADISTICS; CLASSIFICATION; EVOLUTION; MONOCLADY; MONOTHETY; PATTERN CLADISM; PHYLOGENY; SYNAPOMORPHY

Document Type: Short Communication

Affiliations: Department of Plant Taxonomy and Ecology, Eötvös University, Budapest, Hungary;, Email: podani@ludens.elte.hu

Publication date: August 1, 2010

iapt/tax/2010/00000059/00000004/art00002
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more