Skip to main content

The demise of the name Astragalus tenellus Pursh (Fabaceae)

Buy Article:

$14.94 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Rupert Barneby (1964) expressed "doubts of the legality" in adopting " Astragalus tenellus Pursh" (1813) over A. multiflorus (Pursh) A. Gray (1864). His concern was justified since Pursh invalidated his own name when he simultaneously published Ervum multiflorum (the basionym of A. multiflorus) on a different page in the same work and cited " A. tenellus " in synonymy. By the time Astragalus tenellus Pursh ex E. Sheld. (1894) was validly published, it was a later homonym as well as superfluous. Given the status of A. tenellus Bunge (1869), the name of an Old World species in current use, conservation of A. tenellus Pursh ex E. Sheld. is unlikely, and we recommend adoption of A. multiflorus for the North American plant.
No Reference information available - sign in for access.
No Citation information available - sign in for access.
No Supplementary Data.
No Data/Media
No Metrics


Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, U.S.A. and The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York 10458, U.S.A. Mailing address: 18625 Spring Canyon Road, Montrose, Colorado 81401, U.S.A. 2: Harvard University Herbaria, 22 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, U.S.A.

Publication date: 2004-11-01

  • Access Key
  • Free content
  • Partial Free content
  • New content
  • Open access content
  • Partial Open access content
  • Subscribed content
  • Partial Subscribed content
  • Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more