If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email email@example.com
Experiments were conducted to examine aerobic growth of Campylobacter spp. in basal media supplemented with C4-dicarboxylates (fumarate, succinate, or malate) and C3-monocarboxylates (pyruvate or lactate). Basal medium was supplemented with 30 mM fumarate,
succinate, or malate and 0 to 100 mM lactate or pyruvate; inoculated with 106 CFU/ml of Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter fetus, or Campylobacter jejuni; then incubated aerobically at 37° C for 72 h. Optical density (OD) of cultures was measured at 600 nm
during incubation. The effect of adding 0 to 0.20% agar and 0 to 0.10% sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3 ) to media supplemented with 30 mM fumarate and 100 mM pyruvate on Campylobacter growth was also determined. Finally, CFU per milliliter of Campylobacter spp. recovered
from media containing 30 mM fumarate, 100 mM pyruvate, 0.15% agar, and 0.05% NaHCO3 was determined after inoculated media were incubated aerobically or microaerophilically. Results indicated that the OD600 of Campylobacter cultures incubated in media supplemented
with C4-dicarboxylates and C3-monocarboxylates was generally significantly (P ≤ 0.05) greater than growth of cultures incubated in media supplemented with a C4-dicarboxylate only. The OD600 of cultures of Campylobacter spp. grown
in media supplemented with fumarate and pyruvate was higher (P ≤ 0.05) when agar was added, and the addition of NaHCO3 produced an additional increase (P ≤ 0.05) in the OD600 of most of the isolates. There was also a 5- to 6-log increase in Campylobacter
spp. recovered from media supplemented with 30 mM fumarate, 100 mM pyruvate, 0.15% agar, and 0.05% NaHCO3 that was inoculated 103 CFU/ml and incubated aerobically or microaerophilically. Findings indicate that this medium might provide an alternative to incubating Campylobacter
spp. microaerophilically, thus eliminating costs and training required for producing special atmospheres for culturing the pathogen.
Poultry Processing and Swine Physiology Unit, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 950 College Station Road, Russell Research Center, Athens, Georgia 30605, USA. firstname.lastname@example.org
Publication date: April 1, 2013
More about this publication?
IAFP members must first sign in on the right to access full text articles of JFP First published in 1937, the Journal of Food Protection®, is a refereed monthly publication. Each issue contains scientific research and authoritative review articles reporting on a variety of topics in food science pertaining to food safety and quality. The Journal is internationally recognized as the leading publication in the field of food microbiology with a readership exceeding 11,000 scientists from 70 countries. The Journal of Food Protection® is indexed in Index Medicus, Current Contents, BIOSIS, PubMed, Medline, and many others.
Print and online subscriptions are available to Members and Institutional subscribers. Online visitors who are not IAFP Members or journal subscribers will be charged on a pay-per-view basis. Information can be obtained by calling +1 800.369.6337; +1 515.276.3344; fax: +1 515.276.8655, E-mail: email@example.com or Web site: www.foodprotection.org