Comparison of the BAX System PCR Method to Brazil's Official Method for the Detection of Salmonella in Food, Water, and Environmental Samples

Authors: Tomazelli, Ingrid Boesche1; de Freitas, Josinete Barros2; Fabbi, Leania Maria1; Filipini, Terezinha Agnese1; da Silva, Cláudia Maria1; Bedin, Janaina Müssnich1; Duarte, Dalila Angélica Moliterno3; dos Santos, Amaury4; Baccarin, Aldo5; Higa, Lígia Rossi Garcia5; Yano, Dirce Mithico Yamaoka6; Killner, Mário6; Frezza, Andréa Leão Cameiro7; de Gosztonyi Abecia, Eduardo Carlos7; Tronco, Vânia Maria7; Júnior, Osmar Tomazelli8; Júnior, Waldomiro Barioni9

Source: Journal of Food Protection®, Volume 71, Number 12, December 2008 , pp. 2442-2447(6)

Publisher: International Association for Food Protection

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

A two-stage study compared the BAX system PCR method with the reference culture method used by the Brazilian Ministry of Agriculture and Food Supply for the detection of Salmonella in food, water, and environmental samples. In stage 1, fish matrix samples (n = 258) were spiked at several levels with Salmonella and a combination of Salmonella and non-Salmonella competitive organisms. Replicates were analyzed by the BAX system PCR method and the reference method with comparable results (sensitivity ≥ 97.5%, specificity ≥ 83.3%) from both methods at the limit of detection. In stage 2, a total of 1,988 samples with 70 product types were analyzed with both methods. Five laboratories were involved in this study, and the samples used were from routine analyses. The BAX system PCR method was shown to be comparable to the reference method, with a limit of detection of 1.0 to 2.0 CFU/25 g of sample. Analysis of the results obtained in stage 2 and in the combination of stages 1 and 2 for the BAX system showed the following performance: sensitivity ≥ 99.0%, specificity ≥ 97.2%, false-negative rate ≤ 1.1%, and false-positive rate ≤ 2.8%. Therefore, the BAX system appears to be equivalent to the reference method, with ≥97.3% agreement.

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: National Industrial Apprenticeship Service (SENAI), Food Technology Center (LANAL)-Microbiology, Rua Frei Bruno, 201E-Bairro Jardim América, CEP 89.803-800, Chapecó, Santa Catarina, Brazil 2: Ministry of Agriculture and Food Supply-Animal Laboratory Coordination, Brazil, Distrito Federal, Brazil 3: Ministry of Agriculture and Food Supply (LAPA/PE), Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil 4: Ministry of Agriculture and Food Supply (LARA/SP), Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil 5: Food Intelligence (FI), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 6: Products Analysis Laboratory (SFDK), São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil 7: Madasa, Brasil 8: Epagri, Chapecó, Santa Catarina, Brazil 9: Embrapa, Concórdia, Santa Catarina, Brazil

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$37.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A