Choices, Choices: The Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to a Food Safety Decision-Making Problem

Authors: Fazil, A.1; Rajic, A.1; Sanchez, J.2; McEwen, S.3

Source: Journal of Food Protection®, Volume 71, Number 11, November 2008 , pp. 2323-2333(11)

Publisher: International Association for Food Protection

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

In the food safety arena, the decision-making process can be especially difficult. Decision makers are often faced with social and fiscal pressures when attempting to identify an appropriate balance among several choices. Concurrently, policy and decision makers in microbial food safety are under increasing pressure to demonstrate that their policies and decisions are made using transparent and accountable processes. In this article, we present a multi-criteria decision analysis approach that can be used to address the problem of trying to select a food safety intervention while balancing various criteria. Criteria that are important when selecting an intervention were determined, as a result of an expert consultation, to include effectiveness, cost, weight of evidence, and practicality associated with the interventions. The multi-criteria decision analysis approach we present is able to consider these criteria and arrive at a ranking of interventions. It can also provide a clear justification for the ranking as well as demonstrate to stakeholders, through a scenario analysis approach, how to potentially converge toward common ground. While this article focuses on the problem of selecting food safety interventions, the range of applications in the food safety arena is truly diverse and can be a significant tool in assisting decisions that need to be coherent, transparent, and justifiable. Most importantly, it is a significant contributor when there is a need to strike a fine balance between various potentially competing alternatives and/or stakeholder groups.

Document Type: Research article

Affiliations: 1: Public Health Agency of Canada, Laboratory for Foodborne Zoonoses, Guelph, Ontario, Canada 2: Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Animal Health Risk Assessment Unit, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada 3: Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$37.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A