Efficacy of Dose Regimen and Observation of Herd Immunity from a Vaccine against Escherichia coli O157:H7 for Feedlot Cattle
Abstract:A clinical trial was conducted to test the effect of a vaccine product containing type III secreted proteins of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on the probability that feedlot steers shed E. coli O157:H7 in feces. Six hundred eight same-source steers were utilized. Of these, 480 steers were assigned randomly to 60 pens (eight head per pen) and to one of four vaccination treatments (120 cattle per treatment, two head per treatment per pen). The four treatments were (i) no vaccination; (ii) one dose, vaccinated once at reimplant (day 42); (iii) two doses, vaccinated on arrival (day 0) and again at reimplant (day 42); and (iv) three doses, vaccinated on arrival (day 0), on day 21, and again at reimplant (day 42). The remaining 128 steers were assigned randomly to 12 pens within the same feedlot to serve as unvaccinated external controls. The probability of detecting E. coli O157:H7 among cattle receiving different doses of vaccine was compared with that of unvaccinated external control cattle, accounting for clustering by repeated measures, block, and pen and fixed effects of vaccine, corn product, and test period. Vaccine efficacy of receiving one, two, and three doses of vaccine was 68, 66, and 73%, respectively, compared with cattle in pens not receiving vaccine. Cattle receiving three doses of vaccine were significantly less likely to shed E. coli O157:H7 than unvaccinated cattle within the same pen. Unvaccinated cattle housed with vaccinated cattle were 59% less likely to shed E. coli O157:H7 than cattle in pens not receiving vaccine, likely because they benefited from herd immunity. This study supports the hypothesis that vaccination with this vaccine product effectively reduces the probability for cattle to shed E. coli O157:H7. There was no indication that the vaccine affected performance or carcass quality. In addition, we found that vaccinating a majority of cattle within a pen offered a significant protective effect (herd immunity) to unvaccinated cattle within the same pen.
Document Type: Research Article
Affiliations: 1: Department of Animal Science, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0905, USA 2: Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska 68583-0905, USA 3: Bioniche Life Sciences, Belleville, Ontario, Canada K8N 1E2
Publication date: November 1, 2007
- IAFP Members with personal subscriptions to JFP Online: To access full-text JFP or JMFT articles, you must sign-in in the upper-right corner using your Ingenta sign-in details (your IAFP Member Login does not apply to this website). The Journal of Food Protection (JFP) is a refereed monthly publication. Each issue contains scientific research and authoritative review articles reporting on a variety of topics in food science pertaining to food safety and quality. The Journal is internationally recognized as the leading publication in the field of food microbiology with a readership exceeding 11,000 scientists from 70 countries. The Journal of Food Protection is indexed in Index Medicus, Current Contents, BIOSIS, PubMed, Medline, and many others.
Print and online subscriptions are available to IAFP Members and institutional subscribers. IAFP Members with a subscription to JFP Online will have access to all available JFP and JMFT content. Online visitors who are not IAFP Members or journal subscribers will be charged on a pay-per-view basis. Membership and subscription information is available at www.foodprotection.org.
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites