Recovery and Transfer of Salmonella Typhimurium from Four Different Domestic Food Contact Surfaces
Domestic food contact surfaces can play an important role in the transmission of foodborne disease, yet debate continues as to which surface materials pose the greatest risk to consumer health in terms of cross-contamination during food preparation. Salmonella Typhimurium was
inoculated onto stainless steel, Formica, polypropylene, or wooden surfaces (25 cm2) in the presence or absence of protein (tryptic soy broth supplemented with 5% horse serum) and held at room temperature. The pathogen was recovered from the test surfaces immediately after inoculation
(T = 0) and every hour for up to 6 h, by a conventional microbiological sampling technique and by direct transfer onto a model ready-to-eat food (cucumber slices). On all surfaces, pathogen numbers declined during the 6-h holding period, with the most rapid reductions occurring within
the first hour. The presence of protein significantly increased (P < 0.05) the number of bacteria recovered from all surface types. However, regardless of application medium or holding time, the number of bacteria recovered from Formica (in all cases) and stainless steel (in most
cases) was significantly higher than were the numbers on polypropylene or wood. Similarly, regardless of application medium or holding time, significantly higher bacterial numbers were transferred to the model food from Formica or stainless steel than from polypropylene or wooden surfaces.
These differences were greater when the bacteria were applied in a protein-rich medium and the test surfaces held for 1 h or more. The results of this study emphasize that differences, both in recoverability and in the number of bacteria transferred to the model food rather than simply reflecting
differences in pathogen survival, may also reflect differences in the ability of the test bacteria to remobilize from the different surface types. However, the results also demonstrate a fundamental problem when choosing food contact surfaces, i.e., that those characteristics that make a surface
“easy to clean” may also render it more likely to release contaminating pathogens during common food preparation practices.
Document Type: Research Article
Food Microbiology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Jordanstown, Newtownabbey Northern Ireland, BT37 0QB, UK
Food Microbiology Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Ulster, Jordanstown, Newtownabbey Northern Ireland, BT37 0QB, UK;, Tel: +44 28 9036 6697, Fax: +44 28 9036 6028, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
Publication date: October 1, 2007
More about this publication?
IAFP members must first sign in on the right to access full text articles of JFP
First published in 1937, the Journal of Food Protection®
, is a refereed monthly publication. Each issue contains scientific research and authoritative review articles reporting on a variety of topics in food science pertaining to food safety and quality. The Journal
is internationally recognized as the leading publication in the field of food microbiology with a readership exceeding 11,000 scientists from 70 countries. The Journal of Food Protection®
is indexed in Index Medicus, Current Contents, BIOSIS, PubMed, Medline, and many others.
Print and online subscriptions are available to Members and Institutional subscribers. Online visitors who are not IAFP Members or journal subscribers will be charged on a pay-per-view basis. Information can be obtained by calling +1 800.369.6337; +1 515.276.3344; fax: +1 515.276.8655, E-mail: email@example.com
or Web site: www.foodprotection.org
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites