Skip to main content

Comparison of Immunochemical (Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay) and Immunohistochemical Methods for the Detection of Central Nervous System Tissue in Meat Products

Buy Article:

$37.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Three methods are widely used in the United States to detect the presence of central nervous system (CNS) tissue in meat products: the fluorescent enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (F-ELISA), developed in this laboratory, the colorimetric Ridascreen Risk Material 10/5 ELISA (R-ELISA), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service immunohistochemical (IHC) procedure. These assays are based on the immunological detection of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), a neural antigen largely restricted to the CNS. The objective of the current study was to compare the sensitivity and repeatability of these tests for detecting the presence of neural tissue in meat. Ground beef spiked with 0.05 to 0.5% of bovine brain, spinal cord (SC), or dorsal root ganglia, as well as advanced meat recovery samples, were evaluated by each of the three GFAP detection procedures. Interassay coefficients of variation for the F-ELISA GFAP standards were 7 to 25%, and intra-assay variation due to sampling and extraction of spiked ground beef was 7 to 13% for SC and 8 to 14% for brain (n = 10). The F-ELISA was the most sensitive of the methods tested, capable of detecting 0.3 ng GFAP standard per well and the presence of 0.05% brain and SC in meat. The R-ELISA standards produced highly variable results (up to 36% variation) and, as a result, none of these standards were different from zero (n = 26). The R-ELISA resulted in high sample variation in SC-spiked ground beef samples (coefficients of variation were 23 to 50%) and did not detect the presence of brain contamination. After modification of the R-ELISA sampling and extraction methods, SC-spiked sample variation was reduced to 16 to 20%, and sensitivity was improved from 0.3 to 0.2% SC, although brain tissue was still not detected. The IHC analysis of CNS-adulterated ground beef had a sensitivity of 0.2% SC and 0.05% brain, with false-negative rates of 10 to 20% at and above the stated sensitivities. None of the methods examined detected dorsal root ganglia contamination. The F-ELISA detected the presence of CNS contamination in 20% of the advanced meat recovery samples, compared to 3.5 to 5% for the R-ELISA and 2% for IHC. This study suggests that the F-ELISA is much more sensitive and repeatable than either the R-ELISA or the IHC procedure method for the detection of CNS tissue in meat products.

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA 2: Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA

Publication date: March 1, 2006

More about this publication?
  • IAFP Members with personal subscriptions to JFP Online: To access full-text JFP or JMFT articles, you must sign-in in the upper-right corner using your Ingenta sign-in details (your IAFP Member Login does not apply to this website).

    The Journal of Food Protection (JFP) is a refereed monthly publication. Each issue contains scientific research and authoritative review articles reporting on a variety of topics in food science pertaining to food safety and quality. The Journal is internationally recognized as the leading publication in the field of food microbiology with a readership exceeding 11,000 scientists from 70 countries. The Journal of Food Protection is indexed in Index Medicus, Current Contents, BIOSIS, PubMed, Medline, and many others.

    Print and online subscriptions are available to IAFP Members and institutional subscribers. IAFP Members with a subscription to JFP Online will have access to all available JFP and JMFT content. Online visitors who are not IAFP Members or journal subscribers will be charged on a pay-per-view basis. Membership and subscription information is available at www.foodprotection.org.
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • Information for Advertisers
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
iafp/jfp/2006/00000069/00000003/art00025
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more