Skip to main content

Comparative Analysis of a Modified Ecolite Method, the Colicomplete Method, and a Most-Probable-Number Method for Detecting Escherichia coli in Orange Juice

Buy Article:

$37.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)


The Ecolite High Volume Juice (HVJ) presence-absence method for a 10-ml juice sample was compared with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Bacteriological Analytical Manual most-probable-number (MPN) method for analysis of artificially contaminated orange juices. Samples were added to Ecolite-HVJ medium and incubated at 35°C for 24 to 48 h. Fluorescent blue results were positive for glucuronidase- and galactosidase-producing microorganisms, specifically indicative of about 94% of Escherichia coli strains. Four strains of E. coli were added to juices at concentrations of 0.21 to 6.8 CFU/ml. Mixtures of enteric bacteria (Enterobacter plus Klebsiella, Citrobacter plus Proteus, or Hafnia plus Citrobacter plus Enterobacter) were added to simulate background flora. Three orange juice types were evaluated (n = 10) with and without the addition of the E. coli strains. Ecolite-HVJ produced 90 of 90 (10 of 10 samples of three juice types, each inoculated with three different E. coli strains) positive (blue-fluorescent) results with artificially contaminated E. coli that had MPN concentrations of <0.3 to 9.3 CFU/ml. Ten of 30 E. coli ATCC 11229 samples with MPN concentrations of <0.3 CFU/ml were identified as positive with Ecolite-HVJ. Isolated colonies recovered from positive Ecolite-HVJ samples were confirmed biochemically as E. coli. Thirty (10 samples each of three juice types) negative (not fluorescent) results were obtained for samples contaminated with only enteric bacteria and for uninoculated control samples. A juice manufacturer evaluated citrus juice production with both the Ecolite-HVJ and Colicomplete methods and recorded identical negative results for 95 20-ml samples and identical positive results for 5 20-ml samples artificially contaminated with E. coli. The Ecolite-HVJ method requires no preenrichment and subsequent transfer steps, which makes it a simple and easy method for use by juice producers.

Document Type: Short Communication

Affiliations: Charm Sciences Inc., 659 Andover Street, Lawrence, Massachusetts 01843, USA

Publication date: January 1, 2006

More about this publication?
  • IAFP Members with personal subscriptions to JFP Online: To access full-text JFP or JMFT articles, you must sign-in in the upper-right corner using your Ingenta sign-in details (your IAFP Member Login does not apply to this website).

    The Journal of Food Protection (JFP) is a refereed monthly publication. Each issue contains scientific research and authoritative review articles reporting on a variety of topics in food science pertaining to food safety and quality. The Journal is internationally recognized as the leading publication in the field of food microbiology with a readership exceeding 11,000 scientists from 70 countries. The Journal of Food Protection is indexed in Index Medicus, Current Contents, BIOSIS, PubMed, Medline, and many others.

    Print and online subscriptions are available to IAFP Members and institutional subscribers. IAFP Members with a subscription to JFP Online will have access to all available JFP and JMFT content. Online visitors who are not IAFP Members or journal subscribers will be charged on a pay-per-view basis. Membership and subscription information is available at
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more