Skip to main content

Associations between On-Farm and Slaughter Plant Detection of Salmonella in Market-Weight Pigs

Buy Article:

$37.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Thirty swine production units in the midwestern United States were studied to assess the relationship of herd-level prevalence of Salmonella on the farm prior to slaughter versus at slaughter. Fecal samples were collected from 30 pigs on each farm within 48 h of slaughter, and 30 ileocecal lymph node samples were collected in the same shipment cohort at slaughter. Samples were cultured by conventional methods, and Salmonella identity was confirmed by serotyping. Overall, 11.7% (n = 105) of the fecal samples and 14.9% (n = 133) of the ileocecal lymph node samples were positive for Salmonella. Seventeen of the farms (56.7%) had one or more positive fecal samples, and 24 (80.0%) had one or more positive ileocecal lymph node samples. Twenty-four recognized serotypes and three additional distinct antigenic types were identified. Among all isolates, 56.5% had serotypes that were duplicated both on the farm and at slaughter for a particular cohort, whereas the remaining samples lacked a duplicate serotype in the other sample type. There was a positive correlation in the prevalence of Salmonella between fecal samples and ileocecal lymph node samples (Spearman's ρ = 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.89). Linear regression analysis was used to identify two farms that biased the regression estimates. Excluding these farms, 62% of the variance in farm slaughter Salmonella prevalence was accounted for by on-farm prevalence. The analyses suggest that the prevalence of Salmonella spp. at slaughter can be predicted from preslaughter on-farm sampling and vice versa.

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: 1: Department of Medical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin–Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 2: Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine 3: Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana– Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61802, USA

Publication date: February 1, 2005

More about this publication?
  • IAFP Members with personal subscriptions to JFP Online: To access full-text JFP or JMFT articles, you must sign-in in the upper-right corner using your Ingenta sign-in details (your IAFP Member Login does not apply to this website).

    The Journal of Food Protection (JFP) is a refereed monthly publication. Each issue contains scientific research and authoritative review articles reporting on a variety of topics in food science pertaining to food safety and quality. The Journal is internationally recognized as the leading publication in the field of food microbiology with a readership exceeding 11,000 scientists from 70 countries. The Journal of Food Protection is indexed in Index Medicus, Current Contents, BIOSIS, PubMed, Medline, and many others.

    Print and online subscriptions are available to IAFP Members and institutional subscribers. IAFP Members with a subscription to JFP Online will have access to all available JFP and JMFT content. Online visitors who are not IAFP Members or journal subscribers will be charged on a pay-per-view basis. Membership and subscription information is available at www.foodprotection.org.
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • Information for Advertisers
  • Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
iafp/jfp/2005/00000068/00000002/art00005
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
Ingenta Connect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more