The purpose of this work was (i) to investigate the feasibility of a previously reported upstream processing method for PCR template preparation to facilitate the detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from ground beef and (ii) to assess the impact of cell growth (no growth in
the matrix versus growth in the matrix) on molecular detection limits. Two food matrices (autoclaved and raw ground beef) were evaluated in all studies. For no-growth experiments, 10-g meat samples were inoculated with 102 to 107 CFU/g E. coli O157:H7 and then
homogenized. The homogenates were processed to remove large particulates and inhibitors using a two-phase upstream processing method consisting of two sequential centrifugation steps, the second of which used titanous hydroxide to facilitate bacterial immobilization. After upstream processing,
sample concentrates were extracted for DNA isolation and amplified by PCR. For growth experiments, 10-g meat samples were inoculated at 1 CFU of E. coli O157:H7 per gram, allowed to grow to 102 to 107 CFU/g, and then processed for PCR assay. Cell recoveries after
upstream processing ranged from 15.9 to 77.6% and were not facilitated by the use of titanous hydroxide, as compared with a saline control (P > 0.05). Bacterial cell recovery and PCR detection limits were similar when comparing autoclaved ground beef and raw ground beef, but cell
recoveries were highly variable for raw ground beef samples in which E. coli O157:H7 cells were allowed to grow before processing for detection. Overall, PCR detection limits approximated 103 CFU/g of ground beef for all treatments. These results indicate that use of model
food systems may not always provide an accurate replication of real-world conditions when evaluating PCR detection limits.
Document Type: Research Article
Department Food Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
Publication date: February 1, 2005
More about this publication?
IAFP members must first sign in on the right to access full text articles of JFP First published in 1937, the Journal of Food Protection®, is a refereed monthly publication. Each issue contains scientific research and authoritative review articles reporting on a variety of topics in food science pertaining to food safety and quality. The Journal is internationally recognized as the leading publication in the field of food microbiology with a readership exceeding 11,000 scientists from 70 countries. The Journal of Food Protection® is indexed in Index Medicus, Current Contents, BIOSIS, PubMed, Medline, and many others.
Print and online subscriptions are available to Members and Institutional subscribers. Online visitors who are not IAFP Members or journal subscribers will be charged on a pay-per-view basis. Information can be obtained by calling +1 800.369.6337; +1 515.276.3344; fax: +1 515.276.8655, E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org or Web site: www.foodprotection.org