Skip to main content

Reduction of Salmonella by Two Commercial Egg White Pasteurization Methods

Buy Article:

$37.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

The effect of pH, processing temperatures, and preheating steps in two commercial egg white pasteurization procedures (Armour and Standard Brands methods) were evaluated using a five-strain cocktail of Salmonella. We devised a benchtop pasteurization system that would more closely resemble the two commercial processes than could the traditional capillary tube method. The pasteurization methods both require hydrogen peroxide to be metered into the egg white stream between a required initial preheat step and the main heating regimen. Both processes were evaluated at three pH levels (pH 8.2, 8.6, 9.0), at four temperatures (51.7°C/125°F, 53.1°C/127.5°F, 54.4°C/130°F,55.8°C/132.5°F), and over four residence times to allow calculation of D-values at each temperature. When compared at the minimum allowable time and temperatures for each process, our results showed at least a 1-log greater log reduction (P < 0.05) for the Standard Brands method than the Armour method in 10 of 12 of the pH and temperature combinations tested. Almost all runs at any given temperature showed more reduction at pH 9.0 than at pH 8.2 except for the Standard Brands method at 54.4°C and 55.8°C, which showed the most consistent reduction across all three pH levels tested. Analysis of the preheat portion of the two methods showed that there was no contribution (P > 0.05) toward Salmonella reduction when compared with the identical process without the preheating step. We generally observed a greater reduction of Salmonella with egg white at pH 9.0 that is typical of older, off-line processing than with low pH egg white (i.e., 8.2) that is typical of modern in-line processing facilities. This difference was as much as 3.5 log cycles depending on the processing conditions. The data has been used to make recommendations for minimum processing conditions for hydrogen peroxide-based egg white pasteurization.

Keywords:

Document Type: Research Article

Affiliations: Department of Animal Science and The Food and Agricultural Products Research and Technology Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Oklahoma 74078, USA

Publication date: June 1, 2004

More about this publication?
  • IAFP Members with personal subscriptions to JFP Online: To access full-text JFP or JMFT articles, you must sign-in in the upper-right corner using your Ingenta sign-in details (your IAFP Member Login does not apply to this website).

    The Journal of Food Protection (JFP) is a refereed monthly publication. Each issue contains scientific research and authoritative review articles reporting on a variety of topics in food science pertaining to food safety and quality. The Journal is internationally recognized as the leading publication in the field of food microbiology with a readership exceeding 11,000 scientists from 70 countries. The Journal of Food Protection is indexed in Index Medicus, Current Contents, BIOSIS, PubMed, Medline, and many others.

    Print and online subscriptions are available to IAFP Members and institutional subscribers. IAFP Members with a subscription to JFP Online will have access to all available JFP and JMFT content. Online visitors who are not IAFP Members or journal subscribers will be charged on a pay-per-view basis. Membership and subscription information is available at www.foodprotection.org.
  • Information for Authors
  • Submit a Paper
  • Subscribe to this Title
  • Membership Information
  • Information for Advertisers
  • ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
iafp/jfp/2004/00000067/00000006/art00014
dcterms_title,dcterms_description,pub_keyword
6
5
20
40
5

Access Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content
Cookie Policy
X
Cookie Policy
ingentaconnect website makes use of cookies so as to keep track of data that you have filled in. I am Happy with this Find out more