Identification of Inadequately Cleaned Equipment Used in a Sheep Carcass-Breaking Process
Aeromonads deposited on pork during a carcass-breaking process were recovered on hydrophobic grid membrane filters placed on ampicillin-dextrin-ethanol agar. Isolates from 85 honey-yellow colonies from filters on that medium were Aeromonas hydrophila (95%) or Vibrio sp.
(5%). Presumptive aeromonads, coliforms, and Escherichia coli in swab samples from product passing through a sheep carcass-breaking process were enumerated by hydrophobic grid membrane filtration techniques with a detection level of 1 CFU/100 cm2. Total aerobic counts were
determined by a spread plate procedure with a detection level of 1 CFU/cm2. The numbers of aerobes, coliforms, and E. coli in the product were apparently unaffected by the carcassbreaking process, although coliforms and E. coli appeared to be redistributed from shoulder
to loin and leg portions. However, the numbers of aeromonads on product increased by about two orders of magnitude as a result of the process. Few bacteria were recovered from most cleaned, large items of equipment, but aerobes, coliforms, and aeromonads were recovered at log total numbers
of 5.25, 3.96, and 3.26, respectively, from most of 25 samples from bars supporting a conveyor belt. Also, aerobes, coliforms, E. coli, and aeromonads were recovered from 25 supposedly cleaned steel mesh gloves at log total numbers of 10.14, 5.54, 4.73, and 8.30, respectively. Those
findings indicate that inspection of cleaned equipment and microbiological sampling of only food-contacting surfaces, as is the current practice at meat plants, cannot provide assurance that the cleaning of carcass-breaking equipment is adequate. Instead, enumeration of indicator organisms
on product passing through a process seems to be required as well, with subsequent sampling of equipment to identify sources of contaminants if increases in numbers during processing are observed. For surety of adequate cleaning, enumeration of several types of indicator organism may be necessary,
as increases during processing in the numbers of organisms that are present in relatively large numbers on product entering a process may be difficult to detect.
Document Type: Research Article
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Centre, 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, Alberta, Canada T4L 1W1
Publication date: June 1, 1999
More about this publication?
IAFP members must first sign in on the right to access full text articles of JFP
First published in 1937, the Journal of Food Protection®
, is a refereed monthly publication. Each issue contains scientific research and authoritative review articles reporting on a variety of topics in food science pertaining to food safety and quality. The Journal
is internationally recognized as the leading publication in the field of food microbiology with a readership exceeding 11,000 scientists from 70 countries. The Journal of Food Protection®
is indexed in Index Medicus, Current Contents, BIOSIS, PubMed, Medline, and many others.
Print and online subscriptions are available to Members and Institutional subscribers. Online visitors who are not IAFP Members or journal subscribers will be charged on a pay-per-view basis. Information can be obtained by calling +1 800.369.6337; +1 515.276.3344; fax: +1 515.276.8655, E-mail: email@example.com
or Web site: www.foodprotection.org
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Membership Information
- Information for Advertisers
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites