Driver Reaction Time to Tactile and Auditory Rear-End Collision Warnings While Talking on a Cell Phone

Authors: Mohebbi, Rayka; Gray, Rob; Tan, Hong Z.

Source: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Volume 51, Number 1, February 2009 , pp. 102-110(9)

Publisher: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content

Abstract:

Objective: This study examined the effectiveness of rear-end collision warnings presented in different sensory modalities while drivers were engaged in cell phone conversations in a driving simulator. Background: Tactile and auditory collision warnings have been shown to improve braking response time (RT) in rear-end collision situations. However, it is not clear how effective these warnings are when the driver is engaged in attentionally demanding secondary tasks, such as talking on a cell phone. Method: Sixteen participants in a driving simulator experienced three collision warning conditions (none, tactile, and auditory) in three conversation conditions (none, simple hands free, complex hands free). Driver RT was captured from warning onset to brake initiation (WON2B). Results: WON2B times for auditory warnings were significantly larger for simple conversations compared with no conversation (+148 ms), whereas there was no significant difference between these conditions for tactile warnings (+53 ms). For complex conversations, WON2B times for both tactile (+146 ms) and auditory warnings (+221 ms) were significantly larger than during no conversation. During complex conversations, tactile warnings produced significantly shorter WON2B times than no warning (−141 ms). Conclusion: Tactile warnings are more effective than auditory warnings during both simple and complex conversations. Application: These results indicate that tactile rear-end collision warnings have the potential to offset some of the driving impairments caused by cell phone conversations.

Keywords: MULTIMODAL DISPLAYS; CELL PHONES; HEARING; TOUCH; HAPTIC; DRIVER SAFETY; DISPLAYS AND CONTROLS; REACTION TIME; PSYCHOMOTOR PROCESSES; DUAL-TASK PERFORMANCE; ATTENTIONAL PROCESSES; AUDITORY DISPLAYS; HIGHWAY SAFETY

Document Type: Research article

DOI: 10.1177/0018720809333517

The full text electronic article is available for purchase. You will be able to download the full text electronic article after payment.

$28.00 plus tax      Refund Policy

 

OR

Back to top

Key:
Free Content - Free Content
New Content - New Content
Subscribed Content - Subscribed Content
Free Trial Content - Free Trial Content
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
Page Help Click here for Page Help
Shopping cart
Tools
Sign in






Need to register?
Sign up here
Text size: A | A | A | A