Defining Variables of Access to UK Biobank: The Public Interest and the Public Good
Abstract:In this paper, I consider the concepts of the public interest and the public good as principles of ethical assess to UK Biobank. It is sometimes argued that the concepts are synonymous, and that they relate to collective interests that are in tension with an individual's interests. In this paper, I provide an innovative analysis, rooted in the existing policies of UK Biobank, to show that they are separate, but related concepts – the public interest is a procedural test that tries out the reasonableness of actions, and thereby legitimises acts which provide for or support those public goods that are the objects of rights. I illustrate my analysis in respect to four variables, in which access is justified in terms of being compatible with either the public good or the public interest, both or neither.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: July 1, 2013
Stem cell research, cloning, GMOs ... How do regulations effect such emerging technologies? What impact do new technologies have on law? And can we rely on technology itself as a regulatory tool?
The meeting of law and technology is rapidly becoming an increasingly significant (and controversial) topic. Law, Innovation and Technology is, however, the only journal to engage fully with it, setting an innovative and distinctive agenda for lawyers, ethicists and policy makers. Spanning ICTs, biotechnologies, nanotechnologies, neurotechnologies, robotics and AI, it offers a unique forum for the highest level of reflection on this essential area.