“MIND THE GAP PART II”: THE SOUTH AFRICAN SUPREME COURT OF APPEAL AND CHARACTERISATION

Author: FORSYTH, CHRISTOPHER

Source: Journal of Private International Law, Volume 2, Number 2, October 2006 , pp. 425-431(7)

Publisher: Hart Publishing

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Society of Lloyd's v. Price and Lee [2006] SCA 87 (RSA) concerns the enforcement in South Africa of default judgments obtained by the Society of Lloyd's in London against “names” resident in South Africa. After South African first instance courts had expressed differing views, the South African Supreme Court of Appeal applied the relevant English prescription / limitation rule of six year period since judgment (which had not elapsed) rather than the three year period of South African law (which had elapsed). In reaching this conclusion the SCA unequivocally adopted the “via media” approach to the characterisation of the relevant rules of English and South African law. The judgment of the SCA is sensitive to the need to foster uniformity of decision in conflicts of laws cases. The article commends this approach to this thorny issue and the rejection of the mantra that characterisation is governed by the lex fori. The article also discusses the proper approach to the problems of “gap” and “cumulation” which can arise in these situations.

Keywords: Characterisation; prescription; limitation; cumulation; gap; via media approach; uniformity of decision

Document Type: Research article

Publication date: 2006-10-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page