THE DOMICILE OF THE ILLEGAL RESIDENT

Author: FORSYTH, CHRISTOPHER

Source: Journal of Private International Law, Volume 1, Number 2, October 2005 , pp. 335-343(9)

Publisher: Hart Publishing

Buy & download fulltext article:

OR

Price: $43.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

This article comments on the decision of the House of Lords in Mark v Mark [2005] UKHL 42 in which it was held that an illegal resident could, none the less, acquire a domicile of choice in England. This is of significance both as a matter of principle and as a matter affecting the legal relations of the 500,000 illegal residents in the United Kingdom. Lady Hale's speech shows that there was no consistent trend in the authorities across the Commonwealth and her Ladyship rested her judgment on a perceived need to have a person's domicile reflect the system of law with which that person is most closely connected. But the article points out that the rules of the law of domicile are necessarily artificial and must at times, in order to ensure that everyone has a domicile and only one domicile, connect a person to a legal system to which they are not most closely connected. Lord Hope's speech, on the other hand, distinguishes between public and private law and holds that a public law illegality was irrelevant to the private law issue of domicile. But the article point out there has to be a certain connection between public and private law and little guide as to the nature of that connection is given.

Document Type: Research article

Publication date: 2005-10-01

More about this publication?
Related content

Tools

Key

Free Content
Free content
New Content
New content
Open Access Content
Open access content
Subscribed Content
Subscribed content
Free Trial Content
Free trial content

Text size:

A | A | A | A
Share this item with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. print icon Print this page