Carina Trimingham v Associated Newspapers: A Right to Ridicule?
Authors: Matthiesson, Sophie; Barendt, Eric
Source: Journal of Media Law, Volume 4, Number 2, December 2012 , pp. 309-321(13)
Publisher: Hart Publishing
Abstract:This article analyses Tugendhat J's decision in Carina Trimingham v Associated Newspapers. Focusing in particular on Tugendhat J's findings in relation to the Protection from Harassment Act 1997, the article questions the judge's approach to the issues of the claimant's expectation of privacy, the causes of her distress, and the defendant's awareness of her distress. While the claimant's conduct in court made it unlikely that she would succeed in the action, the authors argue that Tugendhat J should have taken the opportunity to signal that repeated references to a person's sexuality sandwiched between offensive comments about that person's appearance are not acceptable and are capable of amounting to harassment.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: December 1, 2012
The only platform for focused, rigorous analysis of global developments in media law, this new peer-reviewed journal is:
- essential for teaching and research
- essential for practice
- essential for policy-making.
It turns the spotlight on all those aspects of law which impinge on and shape modern media practices - from regulation and ownership, to libel law and constitutional aspects of broadcasting such as free speech and privacy, obscenity laws, copyright, piracy, and other aspects of IT law. The result is the first journal to take a serious view of law through the lens.
- Editorial Board
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Email alerts (Hart books and journals)
- Sample Paper
- Publisher's Website
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites