Assessing the Track Record of India's Film Certification Appellate Tribunal
Abstract:In India, the Film Certification Appellate Tribunal (FCAT) was set up as a forum where filmmakers could challenge decisions of the state-run Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC). The FCAT was established to address concerns about rigid censorship by the CBFC. In this article, the author examines some of the FCAT's noteworthy judgements over the past decade. The author argues that the FCAT's track record in upholding creative freedom has not been very satisfactory. The FCAT has only slightly liberalised the parameters for censoring content. Nevertheless, the establishment of the FCAT should still be considered a positive development for the film industry, with potential for improvement.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: December 1, 2010
The only platform for focused, rigorous analysis of global developments in media law, this new peer-reviewed journal is:
- essential for teaching and research
- essential for practice
- essential for policy-making.
It turns the spotlight on all those aspects of law which impinge on and shape modern media practices - from regulation and ownership, to libel law and constitutional aspects of broadcasting such as free speech and privacy, obscenity laws, copyright, piracy, and other aspects of IT law. The result is the first journal to take a serious view of law through the lens.