Arguments for elective single-embryo transfer

Authors: Schröer, Andreas; Griesinger, Georg; Diedrich, Klaus

Source: Expert Review of Obstretrics and Gynecology, Volume 3, Number 4, July 2008 , pp. 475-480(6)

Buy & download fulltext article:

Price: $73.00 plus tax (Refund Policy)

Abstract:

Over the past 25 years, artificial reproductive techniques have significantly improved and are now a well-established practice. While pregnancy, without consideration of obstetric and neonatal outcomes, was the main focus of the practice in the past, today a practice is esteemed successful if a healthy baby is delivered in a short treatment time with low risks for the patient and the baby. Human reproduction itself is quite inefficient. During the period of conception, implantation and placentation to the delivery of a baby, a number of aberrations can occur, resulting either in no pregnancy or a loss of pregnancy. In order to compensate for the low implantation rate of human embryos, it is routine to transfer more than one embryo in each treatment cycle as a routine procedure. As a result, the incidence of multiple pregnancy (MP; twins and higher order pregnancies) after IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection is much higher (30%) than after natural conception (1%). The obstetric, neonatal and long-term consequences for the health of these children need to be scrutinized and financial costs incurred are relatively high. In order to reduce the incidence of MP, particularly in women with a high-risk profile, an elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) after selection of the embryo with the highest development potential becomes a preferred procedure in many countries (particularly European) in situations in which more than one good-quality embryo is available. Clinical trials have shown that programs with over 50% of eSET maintain high overall ongoing pregnancy rates (30% per started cycle) while reducing the MP rate to less than 10%. However, there is still no consensus regarding the subgroup of patients eligible for eSET, while the need to reduce MP is consensus among most experts.

Keywords: elective single-embryo transfer; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF; multiple pregnancy

Document Type: Research article

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/17474108.3.4.475

Affiliations: 1: University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Luebeck, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ratzeburger Allee 160, D-23538 Luebeck, Germany., Email: andreas@drschroer.de

Publication date: 2008-07-01

More about this publication?

Expert Review of Obstetircs and Gynecology provides a unique forum for critical and cutting-edge assessments in this diverse therapeutic area. With rigorous editorial policies, this timely publication is dedicated to complete and comprehensive coverage of key issues in women's healthcare.
Editorial Board
Information for Authors
Submit a Paper
Subscribe to this Title
Information for Advertisers
Terms & Conditions
Information for Librarians
Free Trials
ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites

Arguments for elective single-embryo transfer

Buy & download fulltext article:

Tools

Key

Text size:

Useful pages