Reconstructions of the Artemidorus Papyrus
Abstract:The Artemidorus papyrus was reconstructed by the first editors as a roll, that opened with a short unwritten portion followed by three columns of text dealing with geography in general (fr. a). This would have been followed by a map (fr. b and c) and by two further columns of text with a description of the Iberian peninsula (in fr. c). D'Alessio (2009) argued that the physical evidence provided by the papyrus implies that the sequence of the fragments was b-c-a, and that these surviving sections were preceded by a substantial portion of the roll now entirely lost. In this paper I examine recent reactions to these findings, confuting Canfora's latest hypothesis that the three fragments did not originally belong to a single roll, arguing against Gallazzi's and Kramer's conjectural reshuffling of the preserved fragments, and against Porciani's interpretation of the b-c-a sequence as a fragment from an internal section of Book 2 of Artemidorus' Geography. On the basis of the new reconstruction and of parallels provided by other papyri, I suggest that the Artemidorus papyrus was, from the start, a roll containing miscellaneous selections of texts (at least in one case, an excerpt) and images (including a map).
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: 2012-07-01
More about this publication?
- Historia, first published in 1952 by Karl Friedrich Stroheker and Gerold Walser is an international, peer-reviewed journal on Greek and Roman antiquity. Articles are in English, German, French and Italian. It features original articles on Greek history, the Roman Republic and Empire as well as late antiquity. It covers all aspects of political, economic, religious and social life and deals with legal, archaeological, numismatic and epigraphical questions.
- Editorial Board
- Information for Authors
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Terms & Conditions
- Ingenta Connect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites