Concerning women: questionnaire survey of consultations, embarrassment, and views on confidentiality in general practice among women in their teens, thirties and fifties
Authors: Clare Seamark1; Sue Blake2
Source: Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care, Volume 31, Number 1, January 2005 , pp. 31-33(3)
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content
Abstract:
Background Concern exists that women, and in particular teenagers, do not consult in general practice, particularly for contraception because of embarrassment and concern over confidentiality. The aim of this study was to compare reported consultation rates, embarrassment when consulting, and views on confidentiality of women in three age groups. Methods A postal questionnaire was used to survey women aged 1619, 3639 and 5659 years attending a semi-rural practice in East Devon, UK in December 1999. Results Response rates of 57% (teenagers), 79% (women in their thirties) and 89% (women in their fifties) were achieved. In each group over half the respondents had seen a general practitioner (GP) in the previous 3 months. Embarrassment at attending a GP decreased from 38% of teenagers to only 16% of women in their fifties. There was a similar pattern with 78% of teens and 42% of women in their fifties preferring to see a woman doctor for a women's problem and 31% of teens and 18% of women in their fifties expressing a preference for a woman doctor for any problem. Some 97% of women in their thirties and fifties thought a consultation with a GP would be confidential compared with 88% of the teenagers. Only 9% of the teenage group thought the GP might tell their parents about the consultation. Conclusions This study found that teenagers were just as likely as older women to have seen a GP in the preceding 3 months. Embarrassment at attending decreased with age, as did the preference to see a female doctor for both women's and any problems. The majority of women in each age group believed a consultation with a GP, or practice nurse, was confidential.Document Type: Research article
DOI: 10.1783/0000000052973040
Affiliations: 1: General Practitioner, The Honiton Group Practice, Honiton, UK 2: Research Assistant, The Honiton Group Practice, Honiton, UK
Key:
- Free Content
- New Content
- Subscribed Content
- Free Trial Content


Click here for Page Help