If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email email@example.com
Formosan subterranean termites, Coptotermes formosanus Shiraki, cost residents of Hawaii over U.S. $100 million each year. The aggressiveness of this termite, the unique climate and soil conditions in Hawaii, and the use of Douglas-fir wood, which resists impregnation with chemical preservatives, make the adoption of termite-control methods developed in other regions problematic. Both laboratory and field experiments were designed to simulate spray applications of disodium octaborate tetrahydrate for preventive and remedial termite control. For laboratory assays, sodium borate solutions in water (10%) or in ethylene glycol and water (23.5%) were applied to one face of Douglas-fir heartwood lumber and allowed to diffuse for 1 or 10 wk. Test blocks were cut from the front (treated face) and rear (untreated face) of each board and assayed for boron content and penetration and for susceptibility to attack by C. formosanus. Termites died rapidly upon contacting the board face treated with sodium borate in ethylene glycol. After a 1O-wk diffusion period, mass losses from termites feeding on boards treated with this solution were significantly less (7-9%) than on those treated with aqueous borate solutions (34- 35%) or with solvent controls (37%). However, borate diffusion below the wood surface was <3 mm after 10 wk with all treatments. When Douglas-fir boxes treated either with two or four applications of sodium borate in water or with two applications of sodium borate in ethylene glycol solution were exposed to a field colony of 1.3 million termites for 10 wk, severe damage from termite feeding occurred in all treatments (30-54% mass losses), and there were no significant differences among treated boxes and untreated controls. Although multiple applications of sodium borate solutions are of value in protecting the treated wood surface from insect penetration and also provide some protection from decay fungus growth, such surface applications do not diffuse readily into Douglas-fir heartwood nor wick down termite galleries in the wood rapidly enough to protect the interior of Douglas-fir lumber from termite feeding.
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: December 1, 1994
More about this publication?
Journal of Economic Entomology is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December. The journal publishes articles on the economic significance of insects and is divided into the following sections: apiculture & social insects; arthropods in relation to plant disease; forum; insecticide resistance and resistance management; ecotoxicology; biological and microbial control; ecology and behavior; sampling and biostatistics; household and structural insects; medical entomology; molecular entomology; veterinary entomology; forest entomology; horticultural entomology; field and forage crops, and small grains; stored-product; commodity treatment and quarantine entomology; and plant resistance. In addition to research papers, Journal of Economic Entomology publishes Letters to the Editor, interpretive articles in a Forum section, Short Communications, Rapid Communications, and Book Reviews.