If you are experiencing problems downloading PDF or HTML fulltext, our helpdesk recommend clearing your browser cache and trying again. If you need help in clearing your cache, please click here . Still need help? Email firstname.lastname@example.org
Biological Effects and Persistence of Dursban® in Freshwater Ponds1,2,3
An experiment was conducted in ponds near Bakersfield, California, to determine the effects of the insecticide Dursban® (O,O-diethyl O-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridyl phosphorothioate) on mallard ducklings, Anas Platyrhynchos L.; mosquitofish, Gambllsia affinis (Baird and Girard); corixids, Corisella spp. (Hemiptera); and several zooplankton species. Dursban was applied 4 times at 2-week intervals to small ponds at 0.0, 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, and 1.0 Ib per acre. Total duckling mortality was 42% on the treated ponds and 0% on the control ponds; the difference was significant (P >0.05). Mortality appeared to be independent of treatment rate. At all except the highest rate, Dursban caused only slight (>10%) mortality of caged mosquitofish and did not appear to inhibit their reproduction. Fish exposed to 0.05 lb/acre had Dursban residues of 2.8 ppm at 4 hours, 1.7 ppm at 24 hours, and 0.1 ppm at 2 weeks after treatment. Reduction of Corisella populations was variable but approximately proportional to treatment rate. Except in ponds treated at 1.0 Ib/acre, Corisella populations recovered well from the 1st treatment but less well from subsequent treatments. Cyclops vernalis Fischer and Moina micntra Kurz, the dominant zooplankton species, were markedly affected by the 1st treatment, but populations in ponds receiving the lower rates recovered Within 2 weeks. No C. vernalis or M. micrura population recovered from the 2nd and subsequent treatments. Populations of the crustacean Diaptomus pallidus Herrick and the rotifer Asplanchna brightwelli Gosse were initially low but developed rapidly in those ponds where C. vernalis and M. micrura were reduced by Dursban treatment. A. brightwelli was even abundant in ponds treated at 1.0 Ib/acre. D. pallidus populations did not develop in ponds receiving 1.0 Ib/acre but showed no evidence of being susceptible at the 3 lower rates.
Dursban residues in water were very low 4 hours after treatment (at 1.0 Ib/acre, 0.2 ppm) and declined rapidly (0.006 ppm at 7 days). Initial residue levels in mud were even lower (0.01 ppm) but increased to a maximum (0.3 ppm) at 7 days and presumably declined gradually thereafter. Vegetation residues were high initially but declined rapidly (at 1.0 Ib/acre, 26 ppm at 4 hours, 1.1 ppm at 7 days).
Document Type: Research Article
Publication date: February 1, 1970
More about this publication?
Journal of Economic Entomology is published bimonthly in February, April, June, August, October, and December. The journal publishes articles on the economic significance of insects and is divided into the following sections: apiculture & social insects; arthropods in relation to plant disease; forum; insecticide resistance and resistance management; ecotoxicology; biological and microbial control; ecology and behavior; sampling and biostatistics; household and structural insects; medical entomology; molecular entomology; veterinary entomology; forest entomology; horticultural entomology; field and forage crops, and small grains; stored-product; commodity treatment and quarantine entomology; and plant resistance. In addition to research papers, Journal of Economic Entomology publishes Letters to the Editor, interpretive articles in a Forum section, Short Communications, Rapid Communications, and Book Reviews.
- Editorial Board
- Submit a Paper
- Subscribe to this Title
- Information for Advertisers
- Visit this journal's homepage
- ingentaconnect is not responsible for the content or availability of external websites
Open access content
Free trial content